Washington State Bar Association’s CLE Seminar – “Marijuana Law: Changes in Regulation and Best Practices”
Washington State Bar Association is internet hosting its CLE program, “Marijuana Law: Changes in Regulation and Best Practices” seminar happening subsequent Tuesday, April 12, 2016 in Seattle, Washington.
The marijuana business is a quickly evolving panorama. The seminar will handle modifications and updates within the regulation, what constitutes medical marijuana, business greatest practices referring to contracts, and moral issues in operating a hashish regulation apply.
The seminar will kick off with introductions by program Co-Chairs, Andy I. Aley, Owner at Garvey Schubert Barer and Co-Chair of the Cannabis Industry Practice Group and Jared Van Kirk, Owner at GSB and Co-Chair of its Labor and Employment Practice Group. Emily Harris Gant, additionally Co-Chair of Garvey Schubert Barer’s Cannabis Industry Practice Group, will lead off the seminar with evaluations of Washington’s legislative and regulatory updates.
To view full program and registration particulars, please click on right here: http://bit.ly/1UNLUQF
Warning Regarding Federal Law: The possession, distribution, and manufacturing of marijuana is against the law underneath federal regulation, no matter state regulation which can, in some jurisdictions, decriminalize such exercise underneath sure circumstances. Penalties for violating federal drug legal guidelines are very critical. For instance, a conviction on a cost of conspiracy to promote medicine carries a compulsory minimal jail time period of 5 years for a primary offense and, relying on the amount of marijuana concerned, the wonderful for such a conviction might be as excessive as $10 million. In addition, the federal authorities might seize, and search the civil forfeiture of, the actual or private property used to facilitate the sale of marijuana in addition to the cash or different proceeds from the sale. Although the U.S. Department of Justice has famous that an efficient state regulatory system, and a marijuana operation’s compliance with such a system, ought to be thought-about within the train of investigative and prosecutorial discretion, its authority to prosecute violations of federal regulation is just not diminished by the passage of state legal guidelines which can decriminalize such exercise. Indeed, because of the federal authorities’s jurisdiction over interstate commerce, when companies present providers to marijuana producers, processors or distributors situated in a number of states, they probably face a better degree of scrutiny from federal authorities than do their clients with native operations.