The historical past of hashish in America is rife with racism and inequality. Here’s how you can use your spending energy to battle for change.
To perceive why shopping for weed is totally different from shopping for artisanal kale, you want to perceive weed’s historical past in America. For many years, the media, politicians, and our faculties have unfold misinformation about what hashish is and what it does, together with that weed is a gateway drug (it’s not), that should you smoke weed you’ll go to jail (these likelihood is fairly low should you’re white), and that marijuana causes on the spot habit (the analysis exhibits that, whereas hashish might be addictive, tobacco and alcohol are extra lethal and addictive, comparatively talking).
Robyn Griggs Lawrence, writer of Pot in Pans: A History of Eating Cannabis, explains how this misinformation began. In the 1930s, when the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (now the DEA) rebranded hashish as “marijuana, a frightening ‘new’ drug used primarily by Mexicans and African Americans that could turn upstanding, middle-class (white) kids into helpless victims and raging monsters.” Anslinger’s racist marketing campaign picked up steam with Richard Nixon, who categorised hashish as a Schedule One drug regardless of the incontrovertible fact that people have used hashish medicinally for millennia. In a 1994 Harper’s journal interview, former home coverage chief John Ehrlichman stated, “We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”
– Read the whole article at Bon Appetit.